LEES: Piano Concerto No. 1. GOLD: Piano Concerto*.
Joseph Bloch, piano;
Marisa Regules*, piano; National Orchestral Association/John Barnett, Leon
Barzin*.
Pierian 0010 (F) (ADD) TT: 53:11 BUY NOW FROM ARKIVMUSIC
Tonal composers in the Forties and Fifties. Both Benjamin Lees and Ernest
Gold have led peripatetic lives, at least as young men, and both settled
in sunny Southern Cal. Gold, of course, is known for his movie scores,
most famously, I should think, that for Exodus, whose title song became
a monster pop hit in various arrangements. He was married for a time
to Marni Nixon, the singing voice of many movie stars, and is the father
of
rocker and record producer Andrew Gold. He has, on occasion, produced
concert works. Benjamin Lees scored, I think, two animated shorts,
but has followed
the more usual classical-composer route. People know him mainly for his
concerti and other orchestral works, although he has built up a large
and impressive body of work in just about every genre. Both men, however,
stood
outside the post-Webernian serial mainstream after World War II, their
music showing more in common with pre-war Modernism. Both men also studied
with George Antheil -- Gold after composing his concerto. It says much
for Antheil as a teacher that neither Lees nor Gold sounds like him or
like one another.
Gold's piano concerto brims full of references to composers popular in
the Forties, when the piece appeared -- a little Khachaturian, Prokofiev,
even Rachmaninoff and Gershwin. It's an attractive, though admittedly
minor work. The orchestral and piano writing seem expert, and the themes
themselves
glitter and sing. I balk at the architecture, which teeters a bit, although
not quite as loose as some reviewers have made out. Some have called
it, without meaning a compliment, "movie music," but Gold writes
tighter than the flow of movie narrative allows. Apparently, people hear
a Rachmaninoff swoop or swell and immediately think "movie music," without
considering the current context and apparently without actually listening
to movie music. I do object to Gold's having to stop and start up again
at key points -- notably at the end of the exposition and the beginning
of the development in the first movement -- and to an unconvincing first-movement
ending. Throughout, Gold tends to rely too heavily on sequence (restating
the same idea on, usually, a higher pitch and linking these together in
long chains), rather than creating transformational development within
a movement. Still, ideas from earlier movements turn up disguised in later
movements, and the attractiveness of Gold's music overcomes most of the
problems. The slow movement, for example, is gorgeous, although, like the
first it comes to an abrupt, unsatisfying end. The finale, the weakest
of the three mainly due to an unoriginal appropriation of Gershwin's language,
nevertheless contains some fun things, including a mock fugato.
Still, the Lees stands on an altogether higher level of accomplishment
-- not a surprise, since he's turned out to become one of the outstanding
concerto writers of the past 75 years. Lee's idiom is spikier than Gold's,
showing much in common with American Romantic neo-classicists -- an apparent
contradiction, but not really -- like Piston, Diamond, and Mennin. Lees
depends less than Gold on previous gestures, having worked out his own
vocabulary and musical images almost from the beginning of his career.
Lees also comes up with memorable, if not hummable, themes that also
generate variants of themselves. This gives almost everything he writes
great cohesion,
and the listener seldom gets lost. Lees's instinct for the dramatic,
strong contrast of expression, coupled with a flair for rhythms that
get the body
moving, give his works strong forward impulse. The piano concerto essentially
sweeps you up by the back of your collar and doesn't relax its grip until
the end. There's none of the stopping and starting again we find in the
Gold. Lees masters symphonic rhetoric and argument. The first movement,
a toccata, drives to the end, with a slight rhetorical relaxation for
a lyrical theme. The second movement, slower but no less intense, ignores
the conventional. It's an odd movement -- much of it kind of a mix-meter
march or procession as well as the more familiar Romantic "song" --
which ramps up and falls back, at times threatening to break out into yet
another toccata. This last impression may stem from Lees's penchant for
subdividing rhythm and cross-accent. The toccata figures bound out in the
finale. The emotional landscape of the concerto's a bit unusual as well.
It's a busy terrain, with marching figures, hints of the Baroque, brief
outpourings of dramatic singing, and Bartókian energy. But a psychic
restlessness permeates everything. Listening to this work, I finally understood
why certain critics allied Lees's music with surrealist painting, even
though Lees's music is normally far more energetic than most Surrealism.
It's hard, after all, to write a surrealist musical work of any length.
How would such a thing hang together? Indeed, most Surrealist music consists
of short sections, like Lord Berners's Triumph of Neptune. Lees, however,
grabs onto the emotional disconcert of Surrealism -- particularly something
like Man Ray's gigantic flying lips in L'Heure de l'Observatoire -- and
then writes tight.
The performers in the Gold do okay. They reach a standard familiar to
those of us who have collected infrequently-performed music. However,
Lees gets
much more from the orchestra and especially conductor John Barnett and
pianist Joseph Bloch. Bloch, a name new to me as a pianist (though not
as a writer), plays heroically, with fire, and yet clearly understands
the structure of the work. As David Letterman says, hold on to your wigs
and keys.
The sound seems to derive from radio air checks, with attendant boxiness.
The Gold comes from acetates made in 1945, the Lees from quarter-track
tape from 1963. Pierian applied CEDAR and Waves noise reduction to the
Gold. Nevertheless, you can't get these works otherwise. The Pierian
Recording Society has in a very short time created one of the most interesting
and
important catalogues around, including, of course, CDs of Debussy, Scriabin,
Ravel, and Granados playing their own music. We classical collectors
complain about the old-line "majors" releasing the same old stuff. Pierian
has explored odd corners of repertory and performance with taste and intelligence.
S.G.S. (January 2005)
|